All other arguments for higher bit rates disappeared a long time ago when massive levels of oversampling were introduced, removing the need for brickwall filters. There's absolutely no good reason to, other than specsmanship these days. I'm pretty sure that Rode only allow the interface to run at 96k because everybody else does. The upper limit of the audio and the sample rate are not intrinsically linked at all, up to the Nyquist rate you can always bandwidth-limit the audio.Ĭonsequently there is no point whatsoever in recording at anything higher than 48k if it's normal audio, and only at that rate because it's the norm for video, and Rode knows that - they also know that by limiting the bandwidth, the recording will be technically cleaner because it will reduce the possibility of interference sources getting in. And you will have used twice as much storage space on your hard disk and filled half of it with nothing. ![]() If a file is set to record at 96k, then that is what the ADC will run at. Here's why:īy the time you've reached adulthood, the range of your hearing will have deteriorated to the point where even if you'd got some of these frequencies to record, you'd have trouble hearing anything above 16-18kHz, and if you've spent a lot of time listening to loud music on headphones, it will be even lower. ![]() Rode has specified the input as flat to 20kHz, implying that they've deliberately rolled it off after that. There's a good chance that Rode has limited the frequency range, quite deliberately - it will keep potential intermodulation issues down. What makes you think that there's any audio to record above 22kHz? You'd need a whole load of quite exceptional kit before you'd see anything, and then only if there were bats around. I'm running a Ryzen 3900X build with a Gigabyte X570 Aorus Master motherboard and the latest chipset drivers. I've also already tried different USB ports, cables, Windows user accounts, usb hubs, motherboard drivers and so on. Interestingly enough, the driver works at 96 kHz in Ableton Live 10 Lite that came with the Rode's kit, which basically rules out a hardware fault. ![]() It's also worth noting that the exact same thing happens if I try the same settings in Adobe Premiere, which I assume is due to Premiere using the same audio engine? The Sample Rate settings in Windows for input and playback devices do not affect the error at all. The error occurs in Audition 13.0.13, 14.0 and the current Beta version – it occurs regardless of whether I check "Use machine-specific device defaults" and if I attempt to force the hardware to the document's Sample Rate, I end up with the driver running at 48000 Hz anyway (with no audio being recorded above 24 kHz, even though it should, had forcing the hardware actually succeded). As soon as I change the Sample Rate to any other value, Audition tells me that the "device could not be opened". While it has excellent preamps and works well using MME and WASAPI drivers, on my fully updated Windows 10 (20H2) machine, Rode's ASIO drivers do only work at a Sample Rate of 48000 Hz in Audition. ![]() I've recently bought a Rode Complete Studio Kit that includes the AI-1 Interface.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |